How F1 budget cap is reining in one-off developments – Motorsport.com

That was evident at Monaco, where apart from some brake duct modifications, teams hadn’t added any extra aero items.
Most only brought revised the steering geometry that is traditionally required to help cars get round the hairpin.
While the lack of aero tweaks was also related to this year’s more restrictive bodywork regulations, it was also a function of the budget cap, with teams preferring to spend their limited funds on developments that are beneficial on a wider range of circuits.
“I may not be thanked by the governing body, but it’s very much regulation,” said Red Bull chief engineer Paul Monaghan. “We are quite restricted on what we can do.
“And the absence of modularity makes it very expensive to do the little things we used to do with all winglets, gurneys on the front wing, this type of thing. It’s not practical, it’s not rewarding. And because of the regulations tying us down on the precise geometries, it’s very expensive.
“I wouldn’t be so quick to play down the extra steering lock, it is a far from a trivial undertaking. We have to put the wishbone pickups inside the wheel by regulation, so you can’t just do a longer steering arm, you can’t do this type of thing to try and get the lock.
“We have to seal the holes around the wishbones where they enter the wheel, not play around where we are not supposed to, apparently. So it’s a fairly big undertaking to realise the lock that was always designed in.”
Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB18, Zhou Guanyu, Alfa Romeo C42
Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool
Regarding Red Bull and others bringing revised brake ducts to Monaco, Monaghan conceded that they could also be useful elsewhere later in the season.
“Again, it’s quite a big and expensive undertaking,” he said. “I suppose if you look towards Hungary, look towards Singapore, that’s knowledge and possibly parts that we will take forward to those particular events.
“Where else we might need the high brake cooling? We would probably cope with Spielberg, Baku with one slightly different arrangement. So probably Hungary and Singapore, they’re typically where you really push your luck. And Singapore, especially.”
AlphaTauri technical director Jody Egginton agreed that the budget cap had an impact on the lack of novelties in Monaco, while acknowledging that there have been fewer track specific updates there in recent years.
“I think it’s a number of factors, really,” said Egginton. “A lot of people, including ourselves, bought a high downforce wing to Barcelona. And that is our high downforce package. That’s where we are. So there was nothing else for the moment. We might have another look again for Hungary.
“And then the steering, it’s a given, you’ve got to do it and probably some odds and ends on brake ducts associated with that.
“You can see on one hand, it’s got something to do with budget cap. But then equally, I’m just thinking back on the last three, four years, I don’t remember us being really focused on anything massive for Monaco, not like back in the day where we’d have all sorts of things mounted on the car.
“Probably, for us it was, that’s our package, that’s what it is, we think that’s a competitive package for this event. So we didn’t feel the need to go further and anything new is Monaco specific.
“Maybe it makes it onto the car in Hungary, and maybe it makes it onto the car in Singapore, but it is a long way away.”
Sebastian Vettel, Aston Martin AMR22, Yuki Tsunoda, AlphaTauri AT03
Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images
Aston Martin boss Mike Krack made the intriguing observation that teams will have to think carefully about developing a special low-drag package for the Italian GP.
“We have constant cost monitoring, like we have aerodynamic monitoring or any kind of monitoring that you have,” said Krack.
“So we have a very good overview, week-by-week where we are, in terms of what we are spending, and what the costs will be.
“And before we decide a new, say, for example, a Monza package, or Monza wing, we know what this is costing us, and we know how much money we will have, if we make it.
“We have obviously some margin in for crashes, and stuff like that. I mean, if we repeat the Melbourne thing every weekend, then we will not do the Monza package.”
Horner: Red Bull happy for either Verstappen or Perez to win F1 title
Why McLaren is committed to ‘make it work’ with Ricciardo – for now
Schumacher: P6 in Canadian GP qualifying proves F1 credentials
Tyre pressure issue caused “bitter” qualifying session for Vettel
The highs and lows of F1’s latest supersub Hulkenberg
Schumacher: P6 in Canadian GP qualifying proves F1 credentials
Mercedes: Too early to abandon work on troubled W13 F1 car
Tyre pressure issue caused “bitter” qualifying session for Vettel
F1 team bosses criticise FIA timing on porpoising technical directive
The in-demand helmet designer creating works of art for F1’s best
GP Racing’s OLEG KARPOV pays a visit to designer Jens Munser, to observe the production of Mick Schumacher’s special helmet for the Miami Grand Prix. What follows is some fascinating insight on the mindsets of Mick’s dad Michael, and family friend Sebastian Vettel
How F1’s ingenious ignition revolution brought an instant power boost
Former Mercedes powertrains boss Andy Cowell used to say “it all starts with the bonfire”. PAT SYMONDS explains how clever ignition technology delivered a massive advantage
The long-run F1 data that offers Ferrari hope in Canada
Max Verstappen headed both Canadian Grand Prix practice sessions, as Charles Leclerc faces a 10-place grid penalty after his Baku blowout. Although those signs point to Red Bull dominating the Formula 1 proceedings in Montreal, Ferrari can bring itself into play if it can deliver on the promise of its long runs.
Why “unfair” F1 porpoising rule change needs to be looked at
With the considerable levels of bouncing experienced at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix, drivers have called for changes to ease the stress on their backs. But equally, the Formula 1 teams with cars less susceptible to it are unlikely to accept any differences in the rules, feeling it punishes those who got the 2022 regs right. Both sides to the argument have merit – and the FIA must find a middle ground
Where a key Leclerc strength is obscuring the true nature of F1 2022
OPINION: After clinching pole in Baku, Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc ended the first third of Formula 1 2022 with six poles to one each for his Red Bull rivals. But this doesn’t reflect important traits differentiating the season’s leading cars – here’s why.
Would Leclerc have won in Baku had his Ferrari survived?
Charles Leclerc’s second engine problem in three races meant Max Verstappen had a free run to claim his fifth win of the 2022 Formula 1 season. Whether Leclerc would have been able to repel the Red Bull driver’s charge on much older tyres is a question we’ll never know the answer to. However, there are some clues from the in-race data that we can infer from
Azerbaijan Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2022
Formula 1 has never had a repeat winner at Baku, and that trend continued this year as Max Verstappen avenged his 2021 tyre blowout to lead a Red Bull 1-2. Here’s Motorsport.com’s take on the weekend’s best performers
How Ferrari‘s latest implosion stitched up a plausible Baku upset
Ferrari wasn’t expected to be capable of challenging Red Bull on the streets of Baku, but Charles Leclerc took pole for the second year in a row and had assumed the lead when his engine expired. That left Max Verstappen and Red Bull doubly grateful as not only were its blushes spared, but it came away with a 1-2 and extended advantages in both championship standings


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

You may also like